Expand the section navigation mobile menu

Converting to a Low-Cost or No-Cost Course

Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 7:30 AM

During Open Education week in March, Oakland University Provost Britt Rios-Ellis encouraged faculty to use affordable and OER course materials where content is available. Open Educational Resources (OER) are peer-reviewed, openly licensed, free textbooks and course materials made available from a variety of respected publishers. Open materials allow for the content to be edited, changed, and updated to ensure it more closely matches the course learning objectives, current student needs and reflects the diverse perspectives, cultures, and communities of the students.

OER removes price barriers, saving students money and making it possible for everyone to have their own copy of required course materials from the first day of class. OER is an important tool for diversity, equity, and inclusion, reducing financial barriers to give traditionally underserved students equal access to high-quality learning materials. And OER is just the first step: one piece of open educational practices that can give students more agency involves allowing them to write and revise the texts to tell stories, share facts, and explore questions ignored in traditional texts. As Rajiv Jhangiani (2019) said in a recent keynote, “It's not only about access to knowledge. It's about access to knowledge creation.”

Faculty who teach courses with material costs at $40 or less can now have their courses marked in Banner with a low-cost or no-cost designation by completing the Affordable Course Materials Section Request form.

Transitioning a course to affordable materials can take several paths. Faculty can choose to pull together a reading list or utilize an ebook from OU Libraries collection to replace purchased textbooks. Or, after searching for and reviewing available OER, faculty can adopt or adapt a current resource for their course.

Tips for Converting to a Low or No-Cost Course

  1. When possible, consider using open textbooks, free or low-cost substitutes for high-priced textbooks.
  2. Ensure that the textbooks and materials required on the syllabus are necessary for success in the course.
  3. When using commercial textbooks, investigate options for getting the best price for selections. Start by contacting the OU Bookstore, as they are our partners in helping to reduce costs for students. 
  4. Always submit your textbook choices to the OU Bookstore as early as possible to ensure the availability of all formats and price ranges and to notify students of your selection. *This is important even if you are not using a textbook or using OER and required under Federal law. 
  5. Mark your course in Banner as low or no-cost as soon as you have chosen your materials and inform your students about how they will get access to required materials. 
  6. If you are not finding anything or need additional help, ask for library liaison for assistance.

Want to learn more about using affordable and open resources in your classes and meet other faculty using open textbooks and OER? View the Affordable Course Materials Initiative webpage and Open Education Resources guide.

References and Resources 

Achieving the Dream (Oct. 10, 2018). “New study reveals that OER courses and degrees benefit student retention and completion, improve faculty engagement, and result in cost savings for students.” 

Colvard, N. B., Watson, C. E., & Park, H. (2018). “The Impact of Open Educational Resources on Various Student Success Metrics.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262-276. 

Hilton, J. “Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: a synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018.” Education Tech Research Dev (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4 

Jhangiani, Rajiv. (2019, April) “Beyond free: A social justice vision for open education.” ACRL Conference Proceedings. Cleveland. Retrieved from: https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/record2506

Save and adapt a Google Doc version of this teaching tip.

About the Author

Julia E. Rodriguez is the Health Sciences & Scholarly Communications Librarian at Kresge Library.  She is the team leader for the campus-wide Affordable Course Materials Initiative. She was a SPARC OER Leadership Fellow in 2018-19 and tweets about OER and open education @JujuRLib

Others may share and adapt under Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.

View all CETL Weekly Teaching Tips. Follow these and more on Facebook and Twitter.

Characteristics of Effective Feedback

Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 7:30 AM

“To be effective, feedback needs to be clear, purposeful, meaningful, and compatible with students’ prior knowledge and to provide logical connections” (Hattie & Timperley, 2007, p. 104).

Feedback is essential to learning, often an element of class interaction that students rate favorably. But how do we achieve a balance of productive criticism? Under what conditions does feedback work best? Consider these elements not only in how you provide feedback for your students, but also how students conduct peer review.

  • Task specific – feedback requires learning context and therefore needs to be task specific. There is no advantage to tangential conversations when providing feedback.
  • Self-regulation – feedback should encourage the learner’s self-regulation by enhancing self-efficacy and self-esteem. This concept corresponds with teaching learners how to learn.
  • Low task complexity – feedback should address tasks of low complexity. Goals should be broken down into manageable tasks, as this increases the effectiveness of feedback.
  • Timing – the timing of feedback is not as straightforward as some may think. Quick turnaround on the correctness of simple tasks benefits students. While students may prefer instantaneous feedback, the literature supports that task process feedback benefits from a delay where students have time to think about difficult tasks before receiving the feedback.
  • Praise – the most prevalent and least effective, praise disrupts the positive effects of feedback. It should be used cautiously, as students tend to enjoy private praise though it fails the need for task specificity.
  • Technology enhanced – used appropriately, technology has the ability to provide timely feedback, improve collaboration, increase social presence, increase dialogue, improve reflection, support learning principles, and increase student satisfaction. Consider using the technologies available at your school to optimize technology in providing students feedback.

Reference

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), pp. 81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487. 

Save and adapt a Google Doc version of this teaching tip.

Submitted by: Jodie Hemerda [email protected] University of the Rockies.
Photo credits: Nick Fewings

View all CETL Weekly Teaching Tips. Follow these and more on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

Quantifying Class Participation: Log Participation in the Moodle Grade Book

Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 7:30 AM

I include class participation in the final course grade for my in-person linguistics courses, but I have always found it is challenging to quantify. Participation is obviously not the number of times the student raises their hand to answer a question, but then how do I keep track of it? The Moodle grade book is helpful for this purpose. 

There are certain types of participation I keep track of with a grade of "Yes" or "No," meaning  "done" or "not done." At the end of the semester, I have a clear understanding of how much students participated in those ways, and students themselves also have a record of their participation. Including these items in the grade book signals that they are important for the course rather than merely optional.

Examples of Types of Participation to Track

The following are examples of the types of participation I include in the grade book.

One-time Items

The items below occur once during the course, and I track them when they come up during the semester. Did the student …

  • Sign up for a Chat with Your Professor appointment?
  • Make a posting and post a peer reply in the “getting to know you” discussion forum?
  • Upload a photo or other image to their Moodle user profile? 
  • Send me a description of the language they will work on for the final project?
  • Send me a description of their interviewee for the final project?
  • Send me their word list to be recorded for the final project so I can check it?

Repeating Items

I track the following items with an individual grade book entry each time they come up in the course. Did the student …

  • Send me a relevant YouTube video or other resource for class discussion? 
  • Submit the Moodle survey on a theme we will discuss in class?
  • Make the language recordings needed for analysis in class?
  • Complete practice problems at home to check in class?
  • Have their laptop set up as needed for a class activity?
  • Download information from Moodle for a class exercise?

How to Do It

For each entry in the grade book, I set up an Assignment in Moodle that has just a title and a description. Under “Submission Type,” I unclick “Online Text” and “File Submissions” so there is nothing for students to submit. (I learned about this option during QOTCC with Nic Bongers of e-LIS.) The assignment is an entry in the grade book, but students do not need to upload or write anything. 

Under “Grade,” rather than choosing “None,” I select “Scale” and then “No/Yes.” “No” means the student did not complete the item; “Yes” means they did. “Scale” includes other grading choices you might consider as well, namely: Denied/Approved, Fail/Pass, Does Not Meet Expectations/Meets Expectations/Exceeds Expectations, and Deficiente/Regular/Excelente.

Conclusion

I have found that tracking participation in a transparent manner in the Moodle grade book is helpful for giving students a fair participation grade at the end of the semester. Tracking specific participation tasks keeps students accountable and motivates them to be prepared for class. Including participation items in the grade book sends students the message that it is not just assignments and exams that contribute to their learning and course performance. Consistent preparation and engagement in class activities are also critical.

Save and adapt a Google Doc version of this teaching tip.

About the Author

Helena Riha is a special lecturer in the Linguistics Department and the International Studies Program. Helena has taught over 3,300 students at OU in 16 different courses, and she is currently developing a new online General Education course. Helena is the 2016 winner of the OU Excellence in Teaching Award. This is her eleventh teaching tip. Outside of the classroom, Helena enjoys watching her fifth grader design his own Lego creations.

Edited and designed by Christina Moore, Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning at Oakland University. Others may share and adapt under Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.

View all CETL Weekly Teaching Tips. Follow these and more on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning

Kresge Library, Room 430
100 Library Drive
Rochester, Michigan 48309-4479
(location map)
(248) 370-2751
[email protected]