Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr Google Plus

Colloquium Leenheer

COLLOQUIUM

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY

ROCHESTER, MICHIGAN  48309

 

Patrick De Leenheer

University of Florida


 

Mathematical models of Marine protected areas

Abstract: Marine protected areas (MPAs) are promoted as a tool to protect overfished stocks and increase fishery yields.  Previous models suggested that adult mobility modified effects of MPAs by reducing densities of fish inside reserves but increasing yields (i.e., increasing densities outside of MPAs).  Empirical studies contradicted this prediction: as mobility increased, the relative density of fishes inside MPAs (relative to outside) increased or stayed constant. Initially we hypothesized that this disparity between theoretical and empirical results was the result of differential movement of fish inside vs. outside the MPA.  We therefore developed a model with unequal and discontinuous diffusion, and analyzed its steady state and stability.  We determined the Abundance in the Fishing Grounds, the Yield, the Total Abundance and the Log Ratio at steady-state and examined their response to adult mobility (while keeping the relative inequity in the diffusion constant).  Abundance in the Fishing Grounds and Yield increased, while Total Abundance and Log-Ratio decreased, as mobility increased.  These results were all qualitatively consistent with previous models assuming uniform diffusivity.  Thus, the mismatch between empirical and theoretical results must result from other processes or other forms of differential movement. Therefore we modified our original model by assuming that species located on the boundary of the MPA will preferentially move towards the MPA. This localized movement bias model gives rise to steady state profiles that can differ radically from the profiles in the unbiased model, especially when the bias is large. Moreover, for sufficiently large bias values, the monotonicity of the four measures with increased mobility is reversed, when compared to our original model. Thus, the movement bias model reconciles empirical data and theoretical results

 

Thursday, March 3, 2011

2:30 – 3:30 P.M.

372 Science and Engineering Building

 

(Refreshments at 2:00-2:30 PM in the kitchen area adjacent to 368 SEB)


AcademicsUndergraduate AdmissionsGraduate AdmissionsOnline ProgramsSchool of MedicineProfessional & Continuing EducationHousingFinancial Aid & ScholarshipsTuitionAbout OUCurrent Student ResourcesAcademic DepartmentsAcademic AdvisingEmergenciesFinancial ServicesGeneral EducationGraduate StudiesGraduation & CommencementKresge LibraryOU BookstoreRegistrationAthleticsGive to OUGrizzlinkAlumni EngagementCommunity ResourcesDepartment of Music, Theatre & DanceMeadow Brook HallMeadow Brook TheaterOU Art GalleryPawley InstituteGolf and Learning CenterRecreation CenterUniversity Human ResourcesAdministrationCenter for Excellence in Teaching & LearningInstitutional Research & AssessmentInformation TechnologyReport a Behavioral ConcernTrainingAcademic Human Resources
Oakland University | 2200 N. Squirrel Road, Rochester, Michigan 48309-4401 | (248) 370-2100 | Contact OU | OU-Macomb